Great insight, this helps a lot.

Great advice, thanks for sharing!

Glad you brought up this aspect.

100% agree with this assessment.

Important point that often gets overlooked.

100% agree with this assessment.

Your progress is really impressive.

Any tips for someone just starting with this?

Thanks for going into detail on this.

Good catch on that detail.

This is exactly what I was looking for.

This is often misunderstood, thanks for clarifying.

Your commitment is really inspiring.

Love the discussion this has generated.

Facts!

Amazing how this showed up just when I needed it.

This is going straight into my routine.

This is exactly what I was looking for.

Now which one has a lab that instead of telling me my total test number, it just says “Fyre dude” and the test is good?

Thanks for sharing your experience with this.

Your dedication is really paying off.

This changes how I view the situation.

Perfect timing, was just thinking about this.

My story is almost identical to this.

100% agree with this assessment.

Important distinction to make here.

This makes perfect sense, thanks for clarifying.

Exactly — a cutoff like 1 year would keep reviews relevant, since sources can change quality, batches, or even vanish in no time, and older feedback doesn’t really help people make decisions in the current market.

This gives me a lot to think about.

Been there myself, totally understand.

Really eye-opening information here.

Right — the normal process is just to reach out to the source who set the DNR and request removal, but if it looks off or doesn’t clear properly it could just be a site glitch that needs flagging.

You should be proud of these results.

Perfect!

Quality information, very thorough.

Really eye-opening information here.

You’re absolutely right about that.