Home Forums GENERALGeneral Talk GHK‑Cu Skin vs Joint Benefits — Your Thoughts?
Please login to reply to this topic

GHK‑Cu Skin vs Joint Benefits — Your Thoughts?

Started by JJOHNNY HULK 1 week ago 14 replies 0 views

It gets talked about for both which angle do you think has more behind it?

Replies
Rob 1 week ago

Skin is where GHK-Cu actually shines Human data shows improved collagen elasticity and thickness after consistent topical use Joint benefits are mostly extrapolated from wound healing biology not direct studies

Reply
Noah 1 week ago

If we’re being honest skin has real clinical backing joints are more theoretical anecdotal

Reply
Somo 1 week ago

Mechanistically it should help joints collagen ECM remodeling but evidence isn’t nearly as strong as skin

Reply
Duke 1 week ago

Helped my skin quality a lot joints barely changed

Reply
Luces 1 week ago

Feels more like tissue maintenance than joint repair

Reply
Owen Nếu 1 week ago

I see it as anti-aging not injury healing

Reply
Morris 1 week ago

Skin glow came in weeks Joint relief ? Hard to tell.

Reply
Louis 1 week ago

Works great topically for skin not sold on joints

Reply
Tony Ax 1 week ago

Skin improvements are consistent Joint feedback is hit or miss

Reply
Vance 1 week ago

More cosmetic than orthopedic in my opinion.

Reply
Robert 1 week ago

Skin responds faster because turnover is higher

Reply
Hicks 1 week ago

Joints take longer so effects are harder to notice

Reply
Wyatt 1 week ago

Overall skin first peptide with secondary joint upside

Reply
Zion 1 week ago

Better for aging skin than beat up joints

Reply
Scroll to Top