Thanks for the detailed explanation.

This is gold, thanks for sharing.

This makes perfect sense, thanks for clarifying.

Truth!

100% agree with this assessment.

This community is amazing for support.

Exactly — a cutoff like 1 year would keep reviews relevant, since sources can change quality, batches, or even vanish in no time, and older feedback doesn’t really help people make decisions in the current market.

Truth!

Important distinction to make here.

Very informative post, learned something new today.

This is exactly what I was thinking.

Great to see so many different perspectives.

This is going to make a huge difference.

Spot on analysis, couldn’t have said it better.

What’s your take on the alternative approach?

Right — the normal process is just to reach out to the source who set the DNR and request removal, but if it looks off or doesn’t clear properly it could just be a site glitch that needs flagging.

Exactly!

This is the kind of content we need more of.

Exactly — a cutoff like 1 year would keep reviews relevant, since sources can change quality, batches, or even vanish in no time, and older feedback doesn’t really help people make decisions in the current market.

You’re absolutely right about that.

Solid!

Great to see so many different perspectives.

The knowledge sharing here is incredible.

I’ve had similar experiences with this.

Spot on analysis, couldn’t have said it better.

The knowledge sharing here is incredible.

This is exactly what I needed to change.

Really grateful for this insight.

Quality!

Thanks for the honest feedback.

Truth!

This community is amazing for support.