Good catch on that detail.

Truth!

Can’t wait to implement this advice.

This deserves more attention, great post.

This is the missing piece I was looking for.

Agreed!

Reminds me of what happened to me recently.

This is going to make a huge difference.

Exactly — a cutoff like 1 year would keep reviews relevant, since sources can change quality, batches, or even vanish in no time, and older feedback doesn’t really help people make decisions in the current market.

What would you do differently next time?

Appreciate you breaking this down for us.

Great to see so many different perspectives.

This is gold, thanks for sharing.

This changes how I view the situation.

This is something I’ve been wondering about too.

Well said!

Important distinction to make here.

Your experience really shows in this advice.

This deserves more attention, great post.

Much appreciated, this clears things up.

Agreed!

that would be too much. always think about safety first.

Excellent breakdown of the topic.

How long did it take to see results?

This is exactly what I was looking for.

Appreciate you breaking this down for us.

Thanks for the honest feedback.

This is exactly what I was thinking.

This is exactly what I was thinking.

This changes how I view the situation.

The collective wisdom here is impressive.

Thanks for going into detail on this.

This is the kind of content we need more of.

Thanks for the honest feedback.

Glad you brought up this aspect.

Quality information, very thorough.

What’s your take on the alternative approach?

Can you elaborate on this point?

Planning to start this next week.

This makes perfect sense, thanks for clarifying.

Your dedication is really paying off.

Right — the normal process is just to reach out to the source who set the DNR and request removal, but if it looks off or doesn’t clear properly it could just be a site glitch that needs flagging.

You’re approaching this perfectly.

Agreed!

I’ve had similar experiences with this.

Been there myself, totally understand.