Exactly — a cutoff like 1 year would keep reviews relevant, since sources can change quality, batches, or even vanish in no time, and older feedback doesn’t really help people make decisions in the current market.

This is a crucial consideration.

What would you do differently next time?

100% agree with this assessment.

Appreciate you breaking this down for us.

This forum never fails to deliver quality advice.

Great insight, this helps a lot.

Such a helpful community we have here.

This definitely broadens my understanding.

I can relate to this, went through something similar.

Thanks for sharing your experience with this.

Now which one has a lab that instead of telling me my total test number, it just says “Fyre dude” and the test is good?

Interesting perspective, hadn’t considered that.

This is top-tier advice right here.

Really grateful for this insight.

Thanks for going into detail on this.

You’ve got this, don’t give up.

Yeah, that’s right — from what I’ve seen, the system now factors both total reviews and the quality signals (like upvotes), so detailed, helpful posts carry more weight than just throwing up a bunch of quick one-liners.

Had the exact same thing happen to me.

Perfect timing, was just thinking about this.

Your dedication is really paying off.

Thanks for the honest feedback.

I went through this exact situation last year.

Great insight, this helps a lot.

Keep up the great work!

Yeah, that’s rough — losing karma when you didn’t really earn the wipe can feel unfair, but sometimes you just have to accept it and keep moving forward if you want to get back in.

Great advice, thanks for sharing!

Exactly!

I went through this exact situation last year.

I’ve seen this so many times before.

This brings back memories of my own experience.

Couldn’t agree more with this perspective.

Right — the normal process is just to reach out to the source who set the DNR and request removal, but if it looks off or doesn’t clear properly it could just be a site glitch that needs flagging.

Right on time with this advice.

What would you do differently next time?

I totally agree with this approach.

The collective wisdom here is impressive.

This is gold, thanks for sharing.

Agreed!

Great question, looking forward to the responses.